Should Malpractice Settlements Be Secret?
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, Sage et al1 report a novel study of nondisclosure provisions among Texas malpractice settlementagreements.Nearlyall thesettlementscontained at least one type of disclosure restriction, andapproximately 40% barred claimants fromdiscussing the facts surrounding their injury. Nearly a quarter prohibited claimants fromalertingaprofessional regulatorybody towhat happened. The studyprovides a rare—albeit limited—glimpse into the world of settlements. The data come from one hospital system in one state, and the sample of settled claims (n = 124) is commensurately small. The researchers did not observe the process that led to the provisions, so they cannot shed light on whether they represent negotiated tradeoffs or an accepted boilerplate. Nevertheless, the findings are provocative.Howconcerned shouldpatient safety advocates be about the use of nondisclosure provisions?
منابع مشابه
Empirical comparisons of malpractice claims of different medical specialties
Background: Variables affecting malpractice rates are important to the medical profession. Empirical data on trends in malpractice payments and settlements from anesthesiologists, surgeons, pediatricians and psychiatrists over an eight-year period are publicly available for analysis. Methods: A literature search of PubMed and Index Medicus was conducted for the years from 1985 to 2013 using the...
متن کاملComplications and legal outcomes of tonsillectomy malpractice claims.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To review malpractice cases involving complications following tonsillectomy. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis at a tertiary medical center of jury verdict reports within the LexisNexis (Dayton, OH) database submitted after tonsillectomy malpractice cases. METHODS The LexisNexis MEGA Jury Verdicts and Settlements database was reviewed from 1984 through 2010 for compl...
متن کاملLiability for Medical Malpractice
P_ hysicians and other medical providers are subject to a negligence rule of liability. To prevail, a plaintiff must show that he or she sustained damages that were caused by the failure of the physician to take due care, defined as customary practice of physicians in good standing with the profession, or a significant minority of such physicians. In a simple model, with perfect information and...
متن کاملThe practice of mediation to resolve clinical, bioethical, and medical malpractice disputes.
Mediation is a voluntary process whereby a neutral and impartial third party-t-he mediator--is present to facilitate communication and negotiation between the disputing parties so that amicable settlements can be agreed. Being confidential and non-adversarial in nature, the mediation process and skills are particularly applicable in clinical practice to facilitate challenging communications fol...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- JAMA internal medicine
دوره 175 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015